Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?

[Guest]

[jimmywilliams]

Re: Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?

To make things fair I suggest adding Gubransen, Kimball, Lowrey, and Wurlitzer to the list ... [:D]

[Philip the organist]

Re: Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?



Tough!</p>

I voted for Baldwin, picturing a 60s transistor home
organ. However, I'd rather hear Bach played on a Baldwin D422 than on a
Hammond M3. But, I'd rather hear a recording of Jesse Crawford on an
old 30s Hammond A/B than hear someone playing the same music on a
Baldwin 210.
</p>

[Guest]

Re: Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?

When it comes to electronic organs there is rather a lot of crapness around! It can be difficult to make a decision on which is the crappyest. [:-*]

[telecoustic83]

Re: Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?

Hmm, tough but easy. 60's allen theatre models with the internal stationary speakers and external gyros, theatre compact was kinda cool for a spinet tho, anything lowery i've had newer and older and theyre all horriffic. early allen digitals, i've heard kimballs that sounded better than some of those.

[Brandon Tuomikoski]

Re: Which electronic organs sounds the worse, in your opnion?



I vote Gulbransen. Hammond can make a more pleasing and convincing sound than most any other home organ! Baldwin has made some very nice instruments in the bast. Like their silent touch (?) series stop tab organs were very nice.</p>

Van Der Poel have some very favorable sounding organs for sure!</p>