I substitute now and then in a lovely, historic Baptist Church on a hill overlooking Mystic, Ct. [www.ubcmystic.org].</P>
The organ facade is impressive, but, unfortunately, the organ is not. It is a 1960s custom, two-manual, eight rank instrument made up mainly of Moller pipes. Apparently the Church ran out of money when this was installed and only the one Great Principal extended rank is unenclosed. The remaining pipes are in the Swell box, unified, and divided between the Great and Swell. </P>
The sound does fill the very large open space, but many of the pipes are out of regulation, so the organ, while adequate for the job, is disappointing.</P>
From the beginning, I have suggested, through the Church Organist, that the logicalupgrade totheir organ would be a combination instrument; a three-manual digital instrument also playing the [newly regulated] pipework.</P>
The Church Organist informs me that this solution is apparently more than the budget will allow. The organ committee is very seriously considering abandoning the pipes, except for the facade, and purchasing a Wicks/Viscount "Royal Classic"Organ. I don't know the details yet, but I suspect this is a two-manual drawknob instrument. I will post whatever additional information I can when I get it.</P>
It occurs to me that since the pipes will apparently be abandoned in any event, given the situation I would rather spend 1/4 to 1/3as much money and install a used, three manual, drawknobAllen ADC-8000 with up to 13 channels of audio; one of which is currently available as I write.</P>
Am I wrong? What should I tell the Organist, who is apparently only peripherally involved in the organ improvement project?</P>
Iknow virtually nothingabout the Wicks/Viscount "Royal Classic" instruments. Are they first-rate?</P>
And, I have no financial interest whatsoever in any of this; I just like to see not only improvement, but optimum results.</P>
Rick</P>
Comment