Does anyone know about the Parvus II keyboard? It is a keyboard with pipe organ stops and digital samples. I'd love to see and hear one. It too is pipe organ compatible with P.O.M.I. I could make a one-manual pipe organ with some flutes I have.
Ebay Classic organs
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ahlborn-Galanti Parvus II
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Nikolaos,
I wouldn't get too excited about the Parvus II. It is not of the same quality as the previous H6. It is a real budget job, with no voicing capabilities.
I am just going by what several dealers have told me who actually sold them. I'm not sure where you could go to hear/see one of these. Best to contact the US distributor.
Apparently, a new technology A-G keyboard is coming out in the new year sometime.
AV
-
Hi,
I believe the new products will still use the DRAKE chip, it may use an updated version of it. Apparently the present products do not use the full potential of the chip. It can support both sampling as well as physical modelling or a combination of the two.
The H6 and the console version the H5, have been discontinued since 2005. Older technology products, that didn't immediately get replaced.
The Parvus II, was not really the replacement for the H6.
AV
Comment
-
Thanks for the info. I am a huge fan of Ahlborn-Galanti and the more I learn, the more I like them. The drake chip sounds amazing with its modeling and sampling capabilities. I had read about that recently, but it didn't occur to me right away. I have heard some nice modeling, but I like sampling better. Either way, their pipe organ compatibility that even includes the Parvus keyboard is pretty awesome!
Comment
-
Originally posted by arie v View PostApparently the present products do not use the full potential of the chip. It can support both sampling as well as physical modelling or a combination of the two.
Do you have inside information or is it public knowledge? Could you tell more about this?
Comment
-
Gemshoorn,
Well, you could say I have my sources. No real inside information disclosed here.
As to the DRAKE chip, it is important to remember that it is not a dedicated music chip as such. It is more of the CPU IC, in that it will do what you program it to do. It is used in A-G organs as a controller chip, dsp processor, tone generator chip. From what I understand, the chip can use much more memory. A number of sounds on the A-G organs were already generated by physical modeling.
AV
Comment
-
Originally posted by arie v View PostGemshoorn,
As to the DRAKE chip, it is important to remember that it is not a dedicated music chip as such. It is more of the CPU IC, in that it will do what you program it to do. It is used in A-G organs as a controller chip, dsp processor, tone generator chip. From what I understand, the chip can use much more memory.
Originally posted by arie v View PostA number of sounds on the A-G organs were already generated by physical modeling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gemshoorn View PostI find quite interesting what you say here. The DRAKE processor is a 32-bit one, like in the computers just a few years ago, but I did not know that it is more than a dedicated music chip. Do you have an idea how much memory is in use in an Ahlborn organ today? By this I mean the analog of the computer RAM, not the storage media. The DRAKE, being 32-bit, can address up to 2^32/2^30 GB = 4 GB of memory.
Originally posted by Gemshoorn View PostWhat do you mean here? That some of the stops are not samples and are generated by modelling or that modelling is used to fill-in gaps when the samples are not complete?
From what I understand, the present organs were supposed to have been designed as physically modeled instruments. However, it took too long for them to get the technology going, so they fell back to sample playback. GeneralMusic, at that time the parent company of Ahlborn organs, designed the DRAKE chip, and already had implemented physical modeling in their pianos, keyboards, arrangers, back in the 90s. They were able with their resources to commit quite a bit of capital on research and development. Personally, with the advancement of processor power and cheap available memory, sampling technology is a better or should I say, more cost effective way to get good sound. Ten to 15 years ago, when synthesis chips were slow and primitive, and memory was very expensive per megabyte, physical modeling may have sounded like a very good idea.
AV
Comment
-
Just posted it on eBay today... a lightly used Ahlborn Galanti H6
Hi all...I just posted this on eBay today... I sure hope that a good musician would give this well cared for instrument a good home... thanks.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...STRK:MESELX:IT
Comment
Hello!
Collapse
Looks like you’re enjoying the discussion, but you haven’t signed up for an account yet.
Tired of scrolling through the same posts? When you create an account you’ll always come back to where you left off. With an account you can also post messages, be notified of new replies, join groups, send private messages to other members, and use likes to thank others. We can all work together to make this community great. ♥️
Tired of scrolling through the same posts? When you create an account you’ll always come back to where you left off. With an account you can also post messages, be notified of new replies, join groups, send private messages to other members, and use likes to thank others. We can all work together to make this community great. ♥️
Comment