Gyro Gearloose is stepping in for Larry for this message. Any admissions of obsessiveness made by GG may be denied by Larry. 
Instead of further hijacking Lamar's (Silken Path) epic TC-4 thread I'm posting a new thread in this same forum (rather than the Leslie, Tone Cabinet Forum) because it is connected to the current discussion.
I became fascinated by Allen Gyrophonic Projectors when I was in high school. The school auditorium had a 500-tube Allen organ with four commercial-size (I'm guessing the rotating disks were at least 36" diameter) Gyros in a 2x2 stack on top of the twelve 15" pedal speakers. The first time I saw them in action they were in the very slow rotation mode for random motion. I was mesmerized.
Allen made an incredible number of variations of speakers, amps, auxiliary devices and stationary/rotating layouts inside the same furniture style cabinets for the TC-x and theater organs of the 1960s. My 1971 3-manual analog theater organ came with two Gyro cabinets having the larger 29" rotating disks. The string cabinet has a DC motor and multi-speed controller with the selenium rectifiers but only two of the three speeds are used.
The flute cabinet has an AC motor - on/off only. There are two speakers on the disk but one is for balance only, not connected. (Curious design concept #1.) There is another speaker cabinet for the pedal, traps and upward firing cone speakers for a non-tremulated flute channel. There are both Vibrato and Tremulant tabs. One of them (I forget which now) runs both the rotating and stationary speakers at the same time. (Curious design concept #2.)
The reed channel speaks through upward-firing cone speakers on the flute cabinet; there are no horns. The combination Whind/Tremolo chassis was used to put an electronic tremulant on the reed channel generators only. It was disconnected when I bought the organ, as was the Whind circuitry.
Continuing my high school fascination with all things relating to rotating Allen speakers, I bought four Allen speaker cabinets on ebay that matched the furniture style of my existing cabinets. I picked them up in Cleveland on my way home from a visit to family on the east coast. There are three medium and one short height cabinet, whereas the three cabinets that came with my theater organ are what I call the tall (34") cabinets.
I bought them because one of the cabinets had the upward firing Jensen horns that I coveted (but no motorized flappers). Two cabinets had rotating disks but they are smaller than the ones on my theater organ. Then I found a couple of the 29" Gyro disks with three woofers and three tweeters on each disk. They had been in the annual Allen factory surplus sale and were purchased by locals and then listed on ebay. They were brand new and unused. All three woofers are connected in a series-parallel circuit with a power resistor substituting for the missing 4th driver to keep the levels balanced between the three woofers.
My thought was to convert my third tall cabinet to another gyro cabinet for the reed channel, with both the Jensen horns and a rotating disk. And also upgrade the string cabinet disk. But with Lamar's comment that he did not like the sound of the reeds in a rotating speaker, I'm not sure about that now. And then there's the question of why there is only one connected driver on my flute disk. How will having three spinning woofers sound in comparison.
I like the idea of the multiple speeds for the Gyros. Slow for random motion, slightly faster for celeste and faster for tremolo. I do have three of those horribly obsolete selenium rectifier DC motor drives! Doing some online research I found some fairly inexpensive solid-state fractional-horsepower DC motor drive PC boards. I think they will work but I need to be sure they do not create high frequency electrical noise that will get into the audio through EM radiation out of the motor wiring and windings.
Ah, the joys of infatuation with obsolete technology. Yes, I'm delighted with my Hauptwerk experiments. It sure is a lot easier. And I have no doubt that all of this will end up at the recycling center when I'm gone. But I do still love the sound of an analog instrument.
Despite being two months behind on my move due to multiple complications from hernia surgery, one of these days I'll get around to my projects.


Instead of further hijacking Lamar's (Silken Path) epic TC-4 thread I'm posting a new thread in this same forum (rather than the Leslie, Tone Cabinet Forum) because it is connected to the current discussion.
I became fascinated by Allen Gyrophonic Projectors when I was in high school. The school auditorium had a 500-tube Allen organ with four commercial-size (I'm guessing the rotating disks were at least 36" diameter) Gyros in a 2x2 stack on top of the twelve 15" pedal speakers. The first time I saw them in action they were in the very slow rotation mode for random motion. I was mesmerized.
Allen made an incredible number of variations of speakers, amps, auxiliary devices and stationary/rotating layouts inside the same furniture style cabinets for the TC-x and theater organs of the 1960s. My 1971 3-manual analog theater organ came with two Gyro cabinets having the larger 29" rotating disks. The string cabinet has a DC motor and multi-speed controller with the selenium rectifiers but only two of the three speeds are used.
The flute cabinet has an AC motor - on/off only. There are two speakers on the disk but one is for balance only, not connected. (Curious design concept #1.) There is another speaker cabinet for the pedal, traps and upward firing cone speakers for a non-tremulated flute channel. There are both Vibrato and Tremulant tabs. One of them (I forget which now) runs both the rotating and stationary speakers at the same time. (Curious design concept #2.)
The reed channel speaks through upward-firing cone speakers on the flute cabinet; there are no horns. The combination Whind/Tremolo chassis was used to put an electronic tremulant on the reed channel generators only. It was disconnected when I bought the organ, as was the Whind circuitry.
Continuing my high school fascination with all things relating to rotating Allen speakers, I bought four Allen speaker cabinets on ebay that matched the furniture style of my existing cabinets. I picked them up in Cleveland on my way home from a visit to family on the east coast. There are three medium and one short height cabinet, whereas the three cabinets that came with my theater organ are what I call the tall (34") cabinets.
I bought them because one of the cabinets had the upward firing Jensen horns that I coveted (but no motorized flappers). Two cabinets had rotating disks but they are smaller than the ones on my theater organ. Then I found a couple of the 29" Gyro disks with three woofers and three tweeters on each disk. They had been in the annual Allen factory surplus sale and were purchased by locals and then listed on ebay. They were brand new and unused. All three woofers are connected in a series-parallel circuit with a power resistor substituting for the missing 4th driver to keep the levels balanced between the three woofers.
My thought was to convert my third tall cabinet to another gyro cabinet for the reed channel, with both the Jensen horns and a rotating disk. And also upgrade the string cabinet disk. But with Lamar's comment that he did not like the sound of the reeds in a rotating speaker, I'm not sure about that now. And then there's the question of why there is only one connected driver on my flute disk. How will having three spinning woofers sound in comparison.
I like the idea of the multiple speeds for the Gyros. Slow for random motion, slightly faster for celeste and faster for tremolo. I do have three of those horribly obsolete selenium rectifier DC motor drives! Doing some online research I found some fairly inexpensive solid-state fractional-horsepower DC motor drive PC boards. I think they will work but I need to be sure they do not create high frequency electrical noise that will get into the audio through EM radiation out of the motor wiring and windings.
Ah, the joys of infatuation with obsolete technology. Yes, I'm delighted with my Hauptwerk experiments. It sure is a lot easier. And I have no doubt that all of this will end up at the recycling center when I'm gone. But I do still love the sound of an analog instrument.
Despite being two months behind on my move due to multiple complications from hernia surgery, one of these days I'll get around to my projects.
Comment