Ebay Classic organs

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Need Help Deciding

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Need Help Deciding

    Hi all. New member here and in need of some advice. I'm in the market for a Hammond and have several opportunities available to me. I would love an older TWG model with full manuals and pedalboard. Also, like the convenience of the left-hand presets. In the past I've owned a 50's B3, early 60's A100, M100 (that I used for gigging). All back when they were new! I'm mostly into playing but don't mind some restoration/upgrading as well. On the other hand I've been spoiled by the simplicity of maintenance of the electronics having owned a Thomas Celebrity and currently a Gulbranson.
    Anyway, here is what is available to me: 1st up is an early 80's Commodore 1 owner. I know nothing about it but FREE and it works. The sound sounds like a Hammond immitation to me but, free!? What the heck? And it might be fun to diddle with.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	1981 Hammond Commodore.jpg
Views:	311
Size:	61.8 KB
ID:	658644
    Next up is late 60's H195. Decent appearance cabint-wise. Seller says it has had "lots of electronic work" and "some new tubes". Like, when in doubt, throw in some new tubes. Volume and punch just isn't there in my opinion for this model and they want $700, which seems a little steep. Also, hate the Mediteranian Cab. This might be a pass for me but would like some opinions.Click image for larger version

Name:	Late 1960's Hammond H195.jpg
Views:	326
Size:	128.0 KB
ID:	658645
    Then there is an RT3 that's BEAT! Haven't seen this one in person but owner says it works and has the Leslie (don't know the model of the Leslie...being new here I don't know if I can post photos yet). $900 for that one. The cabinet is rough, but I'm a woodworker and cabinet builder so, not a problem if I were to gut it for repairs and refinish the wood. If the Leslie is good, I'm thinking that this may be worth negotiating some.Click image for larger version

Name:	Hammond RT3.jpg
Views:	310
Size:	63.1 KB
ID:	658646
    Finally, an early 70's Elegante. One owner working condition. Lots of bells and whistles. Good physical condition. Would this vintage still be a TWG? Could be had for under $200.Click image for larger version

Name:	1974 Hammond Elegante.jpg
Views:	306
Size:	171.9 KB
ID:	658647
    So, there we have it. I'm trying to decide what will be the best value now and in the future with/without restoration. Also, if anyone can point me to ANY information/links to posts and whatnot on the above models, I'd appreciate it. Like I said, I mostly want to play it (whichever one i decide on) but also, don't mind some work. Heck, I'm even thinking... a freeby/cheap-o to play now and an "investment" to restore. Although, space is tight and money doesn't grow on trees and I don't want to go broke trying to restore a white elephant....HELP!
    You may only view thumbnails in this gallery. This gallery has 4 photos.

  • #2
    Although they have the downside of being large and heavy, the RT-3 will have the same guts as a B-3 or C-3 of the same era, plus som extra features, and if you can get that plus some decent model of Leslie, that would get you closer to the classic Hammond sound than any of your other options. You'll need organ dollies and three friends to move it.

    The Leslie pictured has no center divider in the upper louvers, which means it could be a 122A, if you're lucky. It could also be a solid state model. Find out more.

    I wouldn't bother with the Commodore or the Elegante.
    I'm David. 'Dave' is someone else's name.

    Comment


    • #3
      Disclaimer: I've only been aquiring and fixing Hammonds for about a year (E100, M100, M3 and A100 also two Leslie 720s and a 245)

      Considering the RT3 has a Leslie with it and how much a Leslie enhances the whole experience, For $900 I would grab that setup in a heartbeat! I would think you could easily recover your investment (and then some) any time in the future. That hardware will always be maintainable and last forever. With what things go for around here that seems like a really good deal. I gave almost twice that for my A100/245 setup and am quite happy. (It had been given a bad black paint job and had a few other issues)

      My second choice would be the “H” but I agree it seems way too high, and no Leslie.

      Again, these are just my opinions based on little buy/sell experience .

      Mmmm... RT3/Leslie...
      Tom in Tulsa

      Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks for the replies. I'd really like th RT3 for a project. I'll have to research a little info on them and go have a look. I'm anxious/frightend of what I may find around back.
        Can anyone tell me what the black "buttons?" are for to the right of the lower manual? Not familiar with that feature. Also, did the RT3 have reverb?
        Thanks, WC

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi and welcome,
          I'd also go with the RT3/Leslie, no question.
          I think the black buttons are extra voices for the pedals.
          A100, X77, M3, M100, E100
          Leslie 147, 145, homemade road Leslie
          My youtube channel

          Comment


          • #6
            The RT3 has a "Pedal Solo Unit" on board, which adds some reed tones and some 32' tones to the pedals. It works somewhat like the oscillators and frequency dividers in transistor combo organs, but with tubes. The switches allow you to select which bass harmonics you want. This is in addition to the normal pedal tones from the tone generator. If you don't want to use the Pedal Solo Unit, you don't have to, since it's a separate sound source. They often are not working quite right at this point in history.

            The RT3 does not have on-board reverb. It's essentially a C3 with a 32-note pedalboard instead of 25, plus the Pedal Solo Unit. It has the exact same tone generator, manuals, and preamp as a B3 or C3.
            I'm David. 'Dave' is someone else's name.

            Comment


            • #7
              RT3. Resale on this would be better than the other 'contenders.'

              Comment


              • #8
                Thanks again for the replies. It looks like the RT3 would be a good "investment" after repairs/upgrades. I'm gonna take a look this coming week. I may still entertain picking up the Commodore or Elegante just for something to play and play with. I heard a couple of youtube presentations on the Elegante that intrigued me as far as the versatility. Might be fun. Thanks again. Will post back after seeing the RT3. I'm sure I'll have more questions.
                WC

                Comment


                • #9
                  The RT3 for sure. You can't touch a functioning Leslie for $900 so if that is included in the sale you can't lose.

                  If you've ever had a need for AGO pedals, here you go. While I would like to see that casework restored, you could easily part out the organ and get some $$$.
                  Hammond RT-3, Boston studio upright piano, Fender Rhodes Mark I 73 stage piano.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    For pure and simple Hammondy-ness, the RT3 is the way to go. Not 100% sure on the Leslie model. The two upper louvres rather than four, what appears to be a plastic ''Leslie" badge, plus the fact that it's still on its original shipping pallet, suggests that it's a late model. But it's still a twin rotor leslie!

                    For pure fun, plus a very big, gutsy sound, the Elegante takes some beating.
                    It's not what you play. It's not how you play. It's the fact that you're playing that counts.

                    New website now live - www.andrew-gilbert.com

                    Current instruments: Roland Atelier AT900 Platinum Edition, Yamaha Genos, Yamaha PSR-S970, Kawai K1m
                    Retired Organs: Lots! Kawai SR6 x 2, Hammond L122, T402, T500 x 2, X5. Conn Martinique and 652. Gulbransen 2102 Pacemaker. Kimball Temptation.
                    Retired Leslies, 147, 145 x 2, 760 x 2, 710, 415 x 2.
                    Retired synths: Korg 700, Roland SH1000, Jen Superstringer, Kawai S100F, Kawai S100P, Kawai K1

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I would definitely take the RT3! It's only a little more than the H but given it has a leslie that's a great deal! The Concorde and commodore aren't worth it though, I'd take a spinet over those any day because of the sound.
                      1949 Hammond CV w/1960 Leslie 45 (converted to 145), using H-1 and Leslie 25 amp
                      1958 & 63 Hammond M3
                      1963 Hammond L100 with 70s Leslie 120
                      1979 Rhodes Piano

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        When I see blue or red or yellow, compared to the brown, black and ivory alone, just visually, I would go for the latter (RT3). If I had all of them already running, and I could play them and hear them, but not see them, I would go for the RT3. How is that for bias? can't be helped...
                        1955 B3, Leslie 21H and 147. Hammond A100 with weird Leslie 205. 1976 Rhodes. Wurlitzer 200A. Yamaha DX7/TX7. Korg M1. Yamaha C3 grand, 67 Tele blond neck, Les Paul Standard, PRS 24, Gibson classical electric, Breedlove acoustic electric, Strat, P Bass, Rogers drum kit, Roland TD 12 digital drums, Apollo quad, older blackfaced Fender Twin, other amps, mics and bits and pieces cluttering up the "studio."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          RT3 plus Leslie, without hesitation. It's a no-brainer.
                          The other options are frankly garbage by comparison.
                          Real tonewheels, identical sound to B3/C3, real two-rotor Leslie..... this is ticking ALL of the boxes.
                          And both machines will run forever with proper maintenance and TLC.
                          Current:
                          1971 T-202 with Carsten Meyer mods: Remove key click filters, single-trigger percussion, UM 16' drawbar volume correction. Lower Manual bass foldback.
                          Korg CX3 (original 1980's analogue model).
                          1967 Leslie 122 with custom inbuilt preamp on back panel for 1/4" line-level inputs, bass & treble controls. Horn diffusers intact.
                          2009 Marshall 2061x HW Plexi head into Marshall 4x12 cabinet.

                          Former:
                          1964 C3
                          196x M-102
                          197x X5
                          197x Leslie 825

                          Comment

                          Hello!

                          Collapse

                          Looks like you’re enjoying the discussion, but you haven’t signed up for an account yet.

                          Tired of scrolling through the same posts? When you create an account you’ll always come back to where you left off. With an account you can also post messages, be notified of new replies, join groups, send private messages to other members, and use likes to thank others. We can all work together to make this community great. ♥️

                          Sign Up

                          Working...
                          X