Another Avoid Wersi OAX V2.00 Software Video

[abacus]

Just like Claudia Hirschfeld couldn’t get anything more than a £50 Casio quality out of the V2.00 software, (See previous thread) Robert Bartha can’t either.
Why Wersi bought out V2.00 software and made OAX worse than a £50 Casio (When the previous software was top notch) escapes me.
Still, see what you think. (And yes I know it’s done by a camera mike which is not ideal)

Bill

[auronoxe]

Well, let‘s compare to the 50$ Casio keyboard.... I think there is a tiny difference ;-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK7HrHFMz2k

I listend to some demos where the same song was played on OAS, OAX1.5 and OAX2.0. Yes, 2.0 sounds a little brighter, somehow the „transparency“ is different (is that what you mean?), but some sounds seem more natural and less static to me.

http://wersiclubusa.com/oax/oas-vs-o...hich-is-which/

[Markr]

I am running OAX 2.0, and now, having tweaked a few settings to my personal taste, prefer it to OAX 1.5, and would not regress back to OAX 1.5. I am also finding it very stable, but I am not doing anything special like playing around with VST’s or midi - I am just playing it as an organ with the built in sounds.

Just love it - I am not sure where all the negativity around OAX 2.0 is coming from, as I certainly would not base my personal views around others recordings, especially when some of those are recorded via a low quality camera mike.

[seamaster]

That beard does nothing for him.