Ebay Classic organs

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Driving a Leslie 120 With a Salvaged AO39

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Driving a Leslie 120 With a Salvaged AO39

    I had a junked AO39 chassis missing the output transformer and a few other parts, being somewhat compulsive I had to fix it use it for something. I was pleasantly surprised to find that Hammond Mfg. makes a whole range of vacuum tube output transformers. I patched the CV, rebuilt AO39 and 120 together and was pleasantly surprised at how well it sounded. As social distancing drags on, I've now discovered I'm perfectly fine with making a fool out myself, so here are some sample sounds:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3cr0DgGOSQ
    Tom in Tulsa

    Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

  • #2
    Well done Tom, you got a nice grind out of that. I forgot it was a single rotor!
    Hammond A100, M102, X5, XB3, XB5, TTR-100,
    Lowrey DSO-1, H25-3, Yamaha E70, RA-100,
    Farfisa Compact Duo MK2, Vox Continental 300,
    Korg BX3 MK1, Leslie 145, 122.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks Dave! I had not heard one of these until now, from what I've read I was expecting it to sound kind of tame or dull. I thought it produced a fairly impressive amount of bass too, considering the small cabinet size. Considering how this one sounds If I was Leslie-less I could see one of these as a fairly decent "bridge" until a dual rotor unit came along 8) I think I might go ahead and mount the little amp inside the box.
      Tom in Tulsa

      Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

      Comment


      • #4
        Where are you getting your distortion? We've had a few discussions on here about CV preamps not having quite enough drive, but we've also discussed some mods for them, including changes to the rheostat box.
        I'm David. 'Dave' is someone else's name.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi David, I basically deleted the hi frequency rolloffs in the preamp and swell box, in addition I increased the shunt resistors on the matching transformer secondary (in the swell box) and bypassed the swell box inductor. The resistance increase substantially increased the drive available to the preamp. I need to scope G-G to see how clean or dirty the preamp actually is. I'll do that shortly 8)
          Tom in Tulsa

          Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

          Comment


          • #6
            I recall these mods were mostly Kon's suggestions.
            Tom in Tulsa

            Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

            Comment


            • #7
              Wes and I had a couple of long threads about optimizing the gain of the CV preamp, but, yes, after you've done that, increasing the drive to the preamp by reducing the signal loss in the rheostat box is the next step to greater output.
              I'm David. 'Dave' is someone else's name.

              Comment


              • #8
                A quick check with the scope on the CV's preamp (as modified) from G-G:
                The output is pretty much clean up to 6-8 volts rms, a lot of headroom for sane activities.
                Things start getting interesting from there, as one increases the 'spectral density' by bringing in more fingers the preamp continues to distort until it reaches a maximum output of about 12 volts.
                With this particular lashup of the AO39 and Leslie 120, the AO39 is mostly clean up to about 2 volts input, so fun things start happening from 2 to 7 volts, then still more from 7 to 12 volts 8)
                I took a quick look at the RT3 (still a virgin). The AO28 seems to behave in a similar fashion, but not quite as pronounced. The distortion starts at a little higher output but has a similar look. As the peaks start to flat-top, there is a downward slope. The AO28 seems to have a smaller transition zone than the CV.


                Tom in Tulsa

                Fooling with: 1969 E100, 1955 M3, 1963 M100, Leslie 720

                Comment

                Hello!

                Collapse

                Looks like you’re enjoying the discussion, but you haven’t signed up for an account yet.

                Tired of scrolling through the same posts? When you create an account you’ll always come back to where you left off. With an account you can also post messages, be notified of new replies, join groups, send private messages to other members, and use likes to thank others. We can all work together to make this community great. ♥️

                Sign Up

                Working...
                X