Advertisement

Forum Top Banner Ad

Collapse

Ebay Classic organs

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



    O.k. I came across a Rodgers Trio 321. I need all info on this organ. I would like a stop list, pictures, and a manual if possible. Is this organ good for classical too? How does it sound? Does anyone have any recordings? I need to know what the organ sounds like before I get it. Thanks!



    I dont know if it is a 321a, b, or c. All I know is that it has the Rodgers real glock, harp, carillon, drums, chinese block and more


  • #2
    Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



    Find out which model it is, as there's a big difference between them, particularly between the 321, 321A and the later 321B, 321C, I'd do a search here on the forum as this has all been discussed before.




    It is a theatre organ, so its base tone is tibia/flute rather than diapason, so it will make straight sounds, but not 'proper' straight sounds, if you get my meaning!




    Andy

    It's not what you play. It's not how you play. It's the fact that you're playing that counts.

    New website now live - www.andrew-gilbert.com

    Current instruments: Roland Atelier AT900 Platinum Edition, Yamaha Genos, Yamaha PSR-S970, Kawai K1m
    Retired Organs: Lots! Kawai SR6 x 2, Hammond L122, T402, T500 x 2, X5. Conn Martinique and 652. Gulbransen 2102 Pacemaker. Kimball Temptation.
    Retired Leslies, 147, 145 x 2, 760 x 2, 710, 415 x 2.
    Retired synths: Korg 700, Roland SH1000, Jen Superstringer, Kawai S100F, Kawai S100P, Kawai K1

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



      Hi Brandon,



      I'll second Andy's comments about trying to find out what specific model of Trio you're looking at. I've got both a 321B and a 322 Deluxe (someday going over to my brothers). The stop lists on all the Trio models are very similar so none of the stops you mentioned identify a specific model. There are differences in speakers (internal/external/both), technology (tremulants - B's & C's have a nice bucket brigade tremulant which gives a bit more flexibility and allows for a nice raspy Post Horn on the B's and C's, combination action - plain 321 and 321A are factory set, B's and C's are capture but it's blind on all Trio's so the stops don't move), nice wood core keyboards on the older 321 with plastic ones on the B's & C's. B's & C's usually have the internal Rodgers glock the older ones tend to have the external box which can give you some limited control over the volume by opening/closing the lid. There are also some differences in the traps and tuned percussions. The older models didn't include a piano, models like the 321B and C do have 'em. None of the stock Trio's have any couplers (manual or pedal)



      The bottom line on all that is that there is a variation in the sound over the range of models so nailing it down will help. Of course a particular Trio might have had external speakers added (or subtracted for the sale if they're particularly nice) and voices may have been re-leveled by the owner to fit their taste and space which may require some tweaking when you get it home.



      I'll try to email you a typical Trio brochure, probably one that covers the 321B that will give you a pic and a stoplist.



      Andy made the point that the Trio's are theatre organs so the stoplist is focused in that direction. I'm not a classical player but I have turned off the trems or used the celeste and my Christmas hymns and caroles sound great to this untrained ear. Note that the Trio models do not have AGO pedalboards but have the slightly smaller princess types. Not a problem for most but it's a sticking point for others.



      The only commercial recording I have is a theatre organ style LP by Bill Million that probably used one of the earlier Trio's. I think the newer Trio's had an improved sound but if you want to hear a clip or two I could send you an MP3 sample.



      You didn't ask but I can tell you that the Trio's are reliable, easy to work on, most parts are easy to find, and there are Rodgers techs out there if you need them.



      Let us know what you find out...



      Gary

      Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
      History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321

        Well I found out it is a plane 321. Just plastic keys. Are you sure the pedals are princess? Doesnt look that small. I would like an audio file Thanks!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



          Hi Brandon,



          Well, I've got in the habit of calling any pedalboard that "looked" like an AGO unit but really didn't exactly match their specification a princess pedalboard. It probably would have been more accurate to say that the 321 pedalboards are not built to AGO specifications. If you do a search of this forum you'll find some discussions about playing AGO vs. non-AGO/princess pedalboards. I read a comparison somewhere but couldn't find it in a quick search. Some of the larger Rogers TO and probably all of their classical instruments are AGO consoles. The differences don't bother me, the natural spacing is something like 2-1/4" which I think is just a shade narrower than AGO. The sharps on the Trio are something like 5" and I think AGO is 6 or 6-1/2"



          I'll pick out a track or two from that Trio recording and send some MP3 to your email account. As I think I mentioned the Trio's I've played sound much better to me than the way they came across on this recording. I think I've also got an LP of a larger Rodgers perhaps a 340 that I'll also try and give you a sample of. They're quite a different instrument but you may find it interesting to hear one of their high-end analog TO.




          Gary

          Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
          History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



            Tinker,




            Your Gulbransen Organs interest me. How do you like the Theatrum model? Are the pedals on this spinet a bit "staggered" as compared to regular spinet organs? These organs have a great sound.




            James

            Baldwin Church Organ Model 48C
            Baldwin Spinet 58R
            Lowrey Spinet SCL
            Wurlitzer 4100A
            Crown Pump Organ by Geo. P. Bent, Chicago, Illinois


            Organs I hope to obtain in the future:

            Conn Tube Minuet or Caprice even a transistor Caprice with the color coded tabs
            Gulbransen H3 or G3, or V.
            Wurlitzer 44, 4410, 4420, ES Reed Models, 4300, 4500, Transistor Models

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



              The pedals are moved over to the right to keep the console dimensions down, James. A bit disconcerting at first but you get used to it!




              Andy

              It's not what you play. It's not how you play. It's the fact that you're playing that counts.

              New website now live - www.andrew-gilbert.com

              Current instruments: Roland Atelier AT900 Platinum Edition, Yamaha Genos, Yamaha PSR-S970, Kawai K1m
              Retired Organs: Lots! Kawai SR6 x 2, Hammond L122, T402, T500 x 2, X5. Conn Martinique and 652. Gulbransen 2102 Pacemaker. Kimball Temptation.
              Retired Leslies, 147, 145 x 2, 760 x 2, 710, 415 x 2.
              Retired synths: Korg 700, Roland SH1000, Jen Superstringer, Kawai S100F, Kawai S100P, Kawai K1

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                Hi James, Andy is right on with the pedal positions. I was fine with the spinet pedals until I started getting all these other consoles around the place. The Theatrum is my only spinet so when I do play it it does take a few minutes and a few botched songs to make the adjustment. I really like the sound of the Theatrum. No strings except for the pedal string bass which is nice. Only two reeds and they're on the solo. I like the clarinet but don't find the trumpet very satisfying since it doesn't strike me as either bright and brassy or sonorous. I think it's got a very nice piano and I only wish the harpsichord on my Rodgers was half as nice, it sounds more like a banjo on my Trio. Everything else, traps, band box, drawbars, leslie, walking bass, etc. makes it a fun little instrument. It's even got a drawer that slides out with chord buttons on it which the little ones like.



                When you look over how they designed this instrument it seems that they didn't skimp on the electronics the way some did. My Theatrum had the original showroom sticker on it which listed a price of something like $4,800 which was a hunk of change back in the 70's (not that it isn't these days...). They broke down a lot of the filtering and voicing into octave chunks so they could control the voicing up and down the keyboard, etc. The physical construction is also really nice, solid cabinet, swing out circuit panels, etc.



                There's a bit too many organs around here to suit my wife and I had hoped to move the Theatrum up to our little cabin but she says there's no room for it and has declared the place an "organ free" zone. I'm hoping to someday sneak a bare bones VTPO up there :^)



                I'd found the Theatrum in a thrift store to replace my Thomas spinet (can't remember if it was a Malibu or ??). Anyway it was head and shoulders above my Thomas so I had no trouble getting rid of my Thomas. I was going to donate it back to the thrift store but a guy drove by and offered me $20 so there it went. I'm still attached to the Theatrum but it doesn't get played as much these days so I may have to part with it, especially if I drag something else home to play around with...



                I really enjoy tone of the Rialto K's and the one I have with the 102/103 Leslies really fills a room with sound. The Rogers is also a nice one and the only one that my wife and her friends think is "beautiful" so it's definitely a keeper. I just passed up a chance to pick up a couple of big Klipsch La Scala speakers only about 20 miles from here. They were the original external speakers on my Rodgers but there's no way I could have hid those in our living room :^)



                Now if I could just take the best features of the Theatrum, Rialto K, Rodgers and Hammond and roll them into one instrument...





                Gary

                Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
                History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                  Hi - James here from Missouri. I recently bought a Rodgers 321 Trio and it was working fine until just a few days ago. This is the problem. I had been using the headphonesa couple of times and the organ worked fine. Today, though, when I sat down to play it I discovered that the reverb control now also regulates the pedal volume and the reverb.

                  In other words, if I turn the reverb down to "0" there is no pedal volume nor reverb. To get the correct volume the reverb has to be turned all the way up. That would be okay except that is way to much reverb. I disconnected the in and outputs for the spring reverb and it not only killed the reverb but the pedal volume.




                  Any help or suggestions would be really appreciated!




                  Thanks, James

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                    Hi James,



                    I've got a 321B (and currently a 322 Deluxe) around the house and have been in and out of them many times for repairs and mods. I'll take a look at the 321 schematics and try to give you a few suggestions to try and isolate your problem. As I recall they do some blending and mixing of the pedal signal between the main and tibia channels and your single channel reverb sits right in the middle of it all.



                    Gary



                    Gary

                    Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
                    History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                      Thanks, Gary. I look forward to what you can find out. Any help is greatly appreciated!




                      James

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                        Hi James,



                        Sorry to take so long to get back to this but with the holidays, a graduation and the usual non-organ things happening around here it's been hectic. So I studied the schematics that I've got for the Trio's but I'm not immediately seeing a failure that could cause the symptoms you're decribing. On my schematics I'm seeing the pedal voices being mixed into both the main and tibia channels just before the expression control circuits. They're then fed to the headphone and power amplifiers as well as the reverb which gets mixed back into both channels. So it's not obvious how the pedal signal could be affected without causing some disturbance in the main or tibia outputs.



                        Let me restate what I think you're seeing just to make sure I've got the right picture a I'll dig a bit more into it.



                        1. When the reverb is turned all the way up the pedal, main and tibia voices all sound OK (except for the excess reverb)?



                        2. If you turn down the reverb then the main and tibia voices are still OK but the pedal drops way down?



                        3. Are you seeing this problem both while using the headphones and when you're using the speakers?



                        4. Do you know specifically what model of Trio that you have? 321, 321A, 321B, 321C (If not, can you provide the serial number.)



                        I have noted some minor differences between the way my Trio's are built and what's shown in the schematics so maybe we're running into that issue. I had to manually trace out some of the circuits to fix a problem or two on mine. I've heard that there were "improvements" in the different model runs so a particular set of diagrams might not match all of the instruments in a series. Work is shutting down for two weeks over the holidays so I should have more time to spend on my organ hobbies :^)



                        Gary

                        Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
                        History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                          Hi Tinker,




                          James here - sorry it has been so long to get back with you - busy season here, too. Yes, the four statements you made are totally correct. I know it sounds crazy! The model is 321 and the serial number is 31107. Thanks for any help you might suggest.




                          James

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321

                            Hi Brandon. It's been awhile since this post. Did you every get your Rogers Trio 321. I'm considering one. Please share stoplist, details and sound files if you have any. Thanks. Eric S.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Needed= Info on Rodgers trio organ 321



                              Hi Eric,



                              What model of 321 are you looking at? There used to be a copy of the 321B/C brochure up on the Rodgers forum that had pics and a stoplist but it's not there anymore. I've got a copy of the file that I could forward to you if you PM me with an email address (it's a little over 900KB). There isn't a lot of difference between the 321B and 321C but there's more differences going to the 321A and 321 models. Stoplists are similar but they made some improvements up in the B and C models. If it's a B or C you're considering I've got a 321B (and a 322 Deluxe) so I could give you additional info and some sound samples from that model if you're interested. Of course different models with different speaker setups and in different room acoustics will sound different. I do have a commercial recording or two of the Trio but I'm not sure what model it is but it sounds like an earlier model to me. The playing is good on them but I don't think the recordings showed the Trio sound in it's best light.



                              Just let us know what you're looking for...




                              Gary

                              Current: Rodgers 340 "Special", Gulbransen Rialto K (Both Versions), Allen Theatre Deluxe, Rodgers Olympic 333, Roland Atelier AT70 (I hope)
                              History: Rodgers 321B, Rodgers 740B, Gulbransen Theatrum, Hammond H-133, Thomas Malibu, Heathkit/Thomas Paramount

                              Comment

                              Hello!

                              Collapse

                              Looks like you’re enjoying the discussion, but you haven’t signed up for an account yet.

                              Tired of scrolling through the same posts? When you create an account you’ll always come back to where you left off. With an account you can also post messages, be notified of new replies, join groups, send private messages to other members, and use likes to thank others. We can all work together to make this community great. ♥️

                              Sign Up

                              Working...
                              X