In an article I was reading recently, one statment really got me thinking. The author, talking about Widor & Rheinberger,asserted that neither of them could be considered a 'great' composer. Now, if you ask anybody who the Great Composers are we would hear the usual names...Bach...Mozart...Beethoven...Brahms...etc etc. So, what criteria must a classical composer fulfil before they can beconsidered 'great'? </P>
It occured to me that many of the common names that might be mentioned wrote little, if anything, for our great instrument. Yet the ones who did write for the organ, and those who wrote significantly for it (such as, for example, Widor) can be, by this author, denied this title. It is surely not to say that Widor's music is of poor quality - on the contrary there are many fine moments in his music, as there is in the music of Vierne, Franck, Alain, Dupre etc (I accept that these are all French, but this is where my passion lies). </P>
Any thoughts???</P>
Comment