Forum Top Banner Ad

Collapse

Ebay Classic organs

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Breaking rules is ok when playing organ?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Breaking rules is ok when playing organ?

    This is from an arrangement of Den blostertid nu kommer. It ends with wrong ending. You are not supposed to let bass and soprano move to F like this. You must use contrary mototion. So bass moves down to F (not up). Why would an organist play it the wrong way. To me it just looks and sounds like a beginner of harmony came up with this. It is weird to me. What is going on? It soynd way better with bass moving down to F.
    You may only view thumbnails in this gallery. This gallery has 1 photos.

  • #2
    Teacher's hat on for a moment. I'll set you a task. Rewrite the last line the way you think it should be and explain your reasons why your way is better. :)

    And the resulting image will be the right way up please!
    It's not what you play. It's not how you play. It's the fact that you're playing that counts.

    New website now live - www.andrew-gilbert.com

    Current instruments: Roland Atelier AT900 Platinum Edition, Yamaha Genos, Yamaha PSR-S970, Kawai K1m
    Retired Organs: Lots! Kawai SR6 x 2, Hammond L122, T402, T500 x 2, X5. Conn Martinique and 652. Gulbransen 2102 Pacemaker. Kimball Temptation.
    Retired Leslies, 147, 145 x 2, 760 x 2, 710, 415 x 2.
    Retired synths: Korg 700, Roland SH1000, Jen Superstringer, Kawai S100F, Kawai S100P, Kawai K1

    Comment


    • #3
      Where have you got your "rules" from?

      No problem with the music here: the soprano moves by step.

      Comment


      • #4
        I asked this question before in another thread and I will ask it again.
        --- How much harmony have you studied so far? And have you learned from books, classes or private instruction? Or other?

        Comment


        • #5
          So much to unpack here. The first thing being context. This is not an organ composition! It is vocal. There is no way for the Bass to arrive at that F through a contrary motion and dropping the Bass down to the lower F would open the chord to an unacceptable degree. Next thing is the strongly held opinion of the poster given their obvious lack of extensive background. Where does that come from? Wrong? How would they know? What are your objectives Henrik? To become an organist or a composer? Or both? Whatever it is more of an open mind would be helpful, I think.

          Comment


          • #6
            This ending is absolutely fine.

            I would like to know a bit more about your musical background, too, henrik.hank

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Leisesturm View Post
              So much to unpack here. The first thing being context. This is not an organ composition! It is vocal. There is no way for the Bass to arrive at that F through a contrary motion and dropping the Bass down to the lower F would open the chord to an unacceptable degree. Next thing is the strongly held opinion of the poster given their obvious lack of extensive background. Where does that come from? Wrong? How would they know? What are your objectives Henrik? To become an organist or a composer? Or both? Whatever it is more of an open mind would be helpful, I think.
              Why wouldn't a bass be able to sing that note? It is in the bass range. Are you saying that it is too low for some baritones? They put bass and baritone together and called it bass. A basso profundo should find that F pretty easy but some baritones might find it too low, I guess.
              I find the lower F better for the organ. Do you dissagree?
              If it is a vocal performance the Soprano sings too low. She sings down to middle C which is low. I find the key of G much better. I feel sorry for all the sopranos who have to sing too low. In silent night a soprano might sing down to Bb3. This is too low for a soprano ie a soprano who sings tge melody.
              I have studied harmony by taking lessons in piano, organ and singing. I do not have a degree in music. I just know some basic stuff.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by regeron View Post
                I asked this question before in another thread and I will ask it again.
                --- How much harmony have you studied so far? And have you learned from books, classes or private instruction? Or other?
                I actually did try a course a a umiversity but it was really weird. The teacher bassically just stood in front of the class and told us the students about harmony. We were also given exercices to do in the classroom. All we had was paper and pen, ie no keyboard at all. It just sounds like the teacher wanted us to learn a lot of grammar. Drilling grammar.
                Did I finish the class? Obviously no. Harmony cannot be taken away from the keyboard or the singing voice. This was some years ago. Back then I didn't know how bad studying harmony at university could be. When you take away harmony from your instrument it won't work.
                What is the best way to learn harmony?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by henrik.hank View Post
                  If it is a vocal performance the Soprano sings too low. She sings down to middle C which is low. I find the key of G much better. I feel sorry for all the sopranos who have to sing too low. In silent night a soprano might sing down to Bb3. This is too low for a soprano ie a soprano who sings tge melody.
                  You would be amazed at the range some sopranos have. I am a soprano. Using American naming convention, my voice goes from e3 to d6 (in Germany, we'd say e to d'''). I used to get to f6 when I was younger. Of course, tessitura is different, but that's more relevant for my solo activities than for choral singing.
                  And in many choirs there are people who're not professional singers and some elderly sopranos I know find it hard to even catch the f5, so... having them sing in F major and going "down" to the c4 is totally fine.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by henrik.hank View Post
                    I actually did try a course a a umiversity but it was really weird.
                    [snip]
                    What is the best way to learn harmony?
                    Take a course at a university and complete it. Then re-read your questions above.

                    Michael
                    Way too many organs to list, but I do have 5 Allens:
                    • MOS-2 Model 505-B / ADC-4300-DK / ADC-5400 / ADC-6000 (Symphony) / ADC-8000DKC
                    • Lowrey Heritage (DSO-1)
                    • 11 Pump Organs, 1 Pipe Organ & 7 Pianos

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by henrik.hank View Post
                      I actually did try a course a a umiversity but it was really weird. The teacher bassically just stood in front of the class and told us the students about harmony. We were also given exercices to do in the classroom. All we had was paper and pen, ie no keyboard at all. It just sounds like the teacher wanted us to learn a lot of grammar. Drilling grammar........... When you take away harmony from your instrument it won't work.
                      What is the best way to learn harmony?
                      You could try working through a book. What about this one? https://www.amazon.co.uk/Harmony-Pra.../dp/1854728334

                      You need to be able to read music and hear it in your head. When I was studying music (a long time ago) we never used keyboards and had to write exam compositions in exam conditions without access to keyboards. J.S. Bach was very scathing about those who composed at the keyboard.

                      It's different now, I know, and I normally do use a keyboard for composing (though I don't do that much) but I often start off without.

                      If you want to follow the rules I think you need to check up on what they are commonly said to be.


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Is the book by tchaichovsky good?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Peterboroughdiapason View Post
                          You could try working through a book. What about this one? https://www.amazon.co.uk/Harmony-Pra.../dp/1854728334

                          You need to be able to read music and hear it in your head. When I was studying music (a long time ago) we never used keyboards and had to write exam compositions in exam conditions without access to keyboards. J.S. Bach was very scathing about those who composed at the keyboard.

                          It's different now, I know, and I normally do use a keyboard for composing (though I don't do that much) but I often start off without.

                          If you want to follow the rules I think you need to check up on what they are commonly said to be.

                          Are you saying that I need to study without a keyboard as well? Is it important? What is it that I should do when studying with pen and paper that studying with a keyboard wont do?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by henrik.hank View Post

                            Are you saying that I need to study without a keyboard as well? Is it important? What is it that I should do when studying with pen and paper that studying with a keyboard wont do?
                            Being able to read a score (i.e. "hear" music in your head just by reading it) is a very important skill. How on earth can you conduct a choir unless you can read the score and know what they should be singing?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I spent one semester in a local feeder college as a Music Major. One of my classes was a theory class. I had already been the organist for the church I grew up in for years. The music was in my body. I don't have perfect pitch but rather something close to it. I can easily look at music and 'hear' it in my mind. The professor explained the same 'rules' of harmony and voice leading that we all now know and gave us a made up Chorale Tune to harmonize. As we were working, no keyboards around, they weren't even mentioned for this particular class. The professor looked at what I had done, took the notepaper from me, went into his office and came back out with copies enough for the entire class and we all sang my four part harmonization on the spot. :-B

                              Comment


                              • myorgan
                                myorgan commented
                                Editing a comment
                                Similar to Leisesturm, my music theory classes put names to what I had already been doing for years, and "corrected" some mistakes I had learned. Our final dictation exercise was to write a 4-part homophonic piece (presumably a hymn) just by listening to the teacher play it somewhere between 4-6 times ONLY on the piano.

                                Hearing the written music in your head, and knowing what something will sound like without being tied to a piano is an ABSOLUTE MUST for a professional musician. Of course, there are always exceptions to that rule as well, as there are always exceptions to other given rules.;-)

                                Michael
                            Working...
                            X