The latest edition of the Allen Organ eNotes landed in my Inbox yesterday. It contains this little gem that represents a recent theme in this publication:
"The hall [Janet Wallace Auditorium at Macalester College in St. Paul MN] housed an older Aeolian-Skinner pipe organ, Op. 1446 from 1964 that was in unfortunate disrepair. The college decided that the costs of repair and for relocation within the new hall were prohibitive."
And so they ripped out a worthless old pipe organ and replaced it with . . . a wonderful new digital imitation of a pipe organ--probably one whose samples came in part from old Aeolian Skinners!
I seem to recall a few months ago that Allen was crowing about another installation in which a church trashed an Aeolian Skinner in favor of a digital pretender.
Are we so in love with new things that even these historic instruments are in danger?
I feared the worst for the A-S at Macalester, but a little reading on OHS seems to suggest that a church in Minnesota bought and refurbished it, adding a few ranks but keeping the vast majority of the original pipework. So why couldn't the college--which probably has a larger endowment that a church--see its way clear to do the same?
While researching Opus 1446, I also ran across Opus 1024. This instrument currently resides at an Episcopal church in Amarillo TX:
http://www.standrewsamarillo.org/org...fications.html
At the time it was acquired, everyone raved about it being in all-original condition. So what did the church do? Hire a builder who trashed the original combination action and relay system, added and moved ranks, and changed the chest configuration. Yep, lots of respect for history there.
Don
"The hall [Janet Wallace Auditorium at Macalester College in St. Paul MN] housed an older Aeolian-Skinner pipe organ, Op. 1446 from 1964 that was in unfortunate disrepair. The college decided that the costs of repair and for relocation within the new hall were prohibitive."
And so they ripped out a worthless old pipe organ and replaced it with . . . a wonderful new digital imitation of a pipe organ--probably one whose samples came in part from old Aeolian Skinners!
I seem to recall a few months ago that Allen was crowing about another installation in which a church trashed an Aeolian Skinner in favor of a digital pretender.
Are we so in love with new things that even these historic instruments are in danger?
I feared the worst for the A-S at Macalester, but a little reading on OHS seems to suggest that a church in Minnesota bought and refurbished it, adding a few ranks but keeping the vast majority of the original pipework. So why couldn't the college--which probably has a larger endowment that a church--see its way clear to do the same?
While researching Opus 1446, I also ran across Opus 1024. This instrument currently resides at an Episcopal church in Amarillo TX:
http://www.standrewsamarillo.org/org...fications.html
At the time it was acquired, everyone raved about it being in all-original condition. So what did the church do? Hire a builder who trashed the original combination action and relay system, added and moved ranks, and changed the chest configuration. Yep, lots of respect for history there.
Don
Comment